Home
   About Us
  Programmes
  Civic Engagement & Advocacy
  Governance & Institutional Development
  Information Management & Networking
  Research & Policy Analysis
  Provincial Activities
  Eastern Province
  Luapula Province
  North Western
  Western Province
  Southern Province
   Networking
  Local
  International
  Reports & Presentations
  Useful Links
 
 
Observing Poverty Reduction
  A compilation of Poverty Assessment Summary Reports 2002-2005
  PDF POWERPOINT
   
 
PEN Newsletter
  September 2007 Ed.
  April 2007 Edition
  September 2006 Ed.
  February 2006 Edition
   
 
Annual Reports
  2007 Jan-Jun [PDF]
  2006 Jan-Jun [PDF]
  2005 [PDF]
  2004 [PDF]


 

Rank the Poor First in PRGF Negotiations, says Civil Society.

 

 

The current projected budget overrun debate calls for a check on resources available for poverty reduction says, Civil Society for Poverty Reduction (CSPR). The CSPR has observed that poverty levels are yet to show significant signs of decline despite more than a year's attempt at implementing Zambia's Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) by government. This is according to a recent poverty monitoring survey conducted in selected provinces as a follow up to a base line survey done in conjunction with ZAMSIF in September 2002. The May 2003 surveys were conducted in sites in Luapula, North Western, Western, Eastern and Southern Provinces, four of which are among the poorest provinces of Zambia and as such areas that should receive a good deal of poverty reduction interventions. Particular focus was on agriculture, education, health, water and sanitation, industry, tourism, mining and cross cutting issues.

CSPR is pleased to note some positive changes in some sites (e.g. Senanga) such as the actual disbursement and use of HIPC funds resulting in the set up of social infrastructure to serve the communities.

It was also comforting to note that other communities visited reported that food security, a prime concern of government and civil society groups, has been attained in their areas largely due to early delivery of farm inputs and the improved rainfalls. Though this may be attributable to factors other than PRSP implementation, it does show some levels of government commitment to addressing the hunger crisis faced in 2002.

 

 However, it should still be noted that other areas continue to report food insecurity as a major concern attributed to inadequate access to farm implements, farm power, inputs, credit and markets (e.g. certain parts of Kalomo). Overall, the survey revealed that the agriculture sector is still beset with high cost and untimely delivery of inputs, poor road infrastructure (both trunk and feeder roads), and inadequate extension services.

The findings go on to reveal that the education sector continues to be constrained by factors such as poor infrastructure (including staff accommodation), inadequate staffing, inadequate teaching materials, HIV/AIDS, few female teachers especially in rural schools, poor teacher morale, high cost, and early pregnancies among others.  Teachers continue to live in poor, often temporary structures made of grass thatched roofs that leak, turning classrooms and office into teachers' accommodation and classrooms that allow wind and rain during the cold season and wet seasons respectively. Majority pupils sit on the ground with hardly any teaching or learning materials. It also appears that the government's announcement of free primary education has not completely removed barriers of cost even at primary level especially at Grade VII.

The health sector recorded several positive developments in certain sites visited such as rehabilitation of health centers, decentralization and autonomy in the form of Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) and Community Health Workers, and a modest improvement in staffing levels. However, even in light of these developments, the survey noted a number of impediments to the provision of quality health services including the long distances patients have to travel to access health coupled with erratic, often expensive and unavailable transport, low staff levels, high cost of health services and inadequate bed spaces.

The report also observes that there is no notable progress towards the provision of safe and clean water and sanitation facilities. Similarly, the survey noted that no notable strategies identified in the PRSP were being implemented in Industry and tourism. Meanwhile in mining, the survey observed that although clearly stated in the PRSP, the issue of licensing gemstone miners has not been addressed resulting in a number of small-scale miners (mostly foreigners) operating illegally and evading tax in some of the areas in which mining is an economic activity.

 

CSPR would like to remind Government that the PRGF agreement commits not only the Government but its people to certain undertakings with the IMF. Consequently, the government should RANK FIRST the well being of the more than two thirds of the population that live in unacceptable poverty conditions. CSPR acknowledges that the PRGF defines the policy framework and space for implementation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, PRSP, and is concerned that like the previous PRGF, the one currently under negotiation will precede Zambia’s next PRSP whose preparation the Government will be spearheading during the remainder of 2004.

There is no doubt that the Government has to do more to improve accountability and budgetary management, but it is unacceptable that the burden of this adjustment should be borne by the poor.

Civil society is demanding that the IMF fulfils its promise as laid out in its often repeated claims to become more pro-poor. It continues to preach fiscal austerity but does not complain about the misallocation of HIPC resources which are supposed to go to poverty reduction, and the suspension of the independent HIPC Monitoring Team, on which civil society played a big role.

We call upon the IMF at all levels to show that it is able to set the right priorities in economic policy advice. If it does this, there will be no need to maintain the secrecy characterising its negotiations with the government. As Zambians, we are afraid that if this trend of non- inclusion in the negotiations continues, the real costs of reaching the much needed HIPC completion point will outweigh the promised benefits.
 

Besinati Mpepo,
Former Coordinator

Endorsed by:
Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (JCTR)
Catholic Commission for Justice Development and Peace (CCJDP)
Civil Servants Union of Zambia (CSUZ)
Community Based Natural Resource Management and Sustainable Agriculture (CONASA)
Forum for African Women Educationalists in Zambia (FAWEZA)

Download Entire Release [PDF]

        2004

 
 

 
 
  Announcements & Events
 
Civil Society Regional Workshop on Engagement in National Development Processes (organised by Zambia Council for Social Development (ZCSD) and CSPR).
 
Civil Society Day and Day of Action against poverty Reduction: 17th October, 2007
 

 

 
  Press Releases
Reaction to the Launch of the Fifth National Development Plan...
A Call To action for Pro Poor National Development!!!

Press Statement on Zambia's 2006 Tripartite Elections...
National ownership of NDP key to effective poverty reduction and attainment of MDGs
Civil Society's Statement at the National Stakeholder Meeting for the Draft 5th National Development Plan..
The Launch of Civil Society Input to the FNDP
CSPR Endorses 2006 - 2010 Strategic Plan.
The Need for Zambia To Triple Her Efforts for Sustainable PRO-POOR Development and The Achievements of The MDGs.
The National Stakeholder Meeting for the 5th National Development Plan.
 
[Press Release Archive]
 
 
 
   
     
 

 

 
 
© 2006 Civil Society for Poverty Reduction - CSPR. All rights reserved.
site designed by
Microware Information Systems