|
The current projected budget
overrun debate calls for a check on resources
available for poverty reduction says, Civil
Society for Poverty Reduction (CSPR). The CSPR
has observed that poverty levels are yet to show
significant signs of decline despite more than a
year's attempt at implementing Zambia's Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) by government.
This is according to a recent poverty monitoring
survey conducted in selected provinces as a
follow up to a base line survey done in
conjunction with ZAMSIF in September 2002. The
May 2003 surveys were conducted in sites in
Luapula, North Western, Western, Eastern and
Southern Provinces, four of which are among the
poorest provinces of Zambia and as such areas
that should receive a good deal of poverty
reduction interventions. Particular focus was on
agriculture, education, health, water and
sanitation, industry, tourism, mining and cross
cutting issues.
CSPR is pleased to note some
positive changes in some sites (e.g. Senanga)
such as the actual disbursement and use of HIPC
funds resulting in the set up of social
infrastructure to serve the communities.
It was also comforting to note
that other communities visited reported that
food security, a prime concern of government and
civil society groups, has been attained in their
areas largely due to early delivery of farm
inputs and the improved rainfalls. Though this
may be attributable to factors other than PRSP
implementation, it does show some levels of
government commitment to addressing the hunger
crisis faced in 2002.
However,
it should still be noted that other areas
continue to report food insecurity as a major
concern attributed to inadequate access to farm
implements, farm power, inputs, credit and
markets (e.g. certain parts of Kalomo). Overall,
the survey revealed that the agriculture sector
is still beset with high cost and untimely
delivery of inputs, poor road infrastructure
(both trunk and feeder roads), and inadequate
extension services.
The findings go on to reveal that
the education sector continues to be constrained
by factors such as poor infrastructure
(including staff accommodation), inadequate
staffing, inadequate teaching materials,
HIV/AIDS, few female teachers especially in
rural schools, poor teacher morale, high cost,
and early pregnancies among others. Teachers
continue to live in poor, often temporary
structures made of grass thatched roofs that
leak, turning classrooms and office into
teachers' accommodation and classrooms that
allow wind and rain during the cold season and
wet seasons respectively. Majority pupils sit on
the ground with hardly any teaching or learning
materials. It also appears that the government's
announcement of free primary education has not
completely removed barriers of cost even at
primary level especially at Grade VII.
The health sector recorded
several positive developments in certain sites
visited such as rehabilitation of health
centers, decentralization and autonomy in the
form of Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) and
Community Health Workers, and a modest
improvement in staffing levels. However, even in
light of these developments, the survey noted a
number of impediments to the provision of
quality health services including the long
distances patients have to travel to access
health coupled with erratic, often expensive and
unavailable transport, low staff levels, high
cost of health services and inadequate bed
spaces.
The report also observes that
there is no notable progress towards the
provision of safe and clean water and sanitation
facilities. Similarly, the survey noted that no
notable strategies identified in the PRSP were
being implemented in Industry and tourism.
Meanwhile in mining, the survey observed that
although clearly stated in the PRSP, the issue
of licensing gemstone miners has not been
addressed resulting in a number of small-scale
miners (mostly foreigners) operating illegally
and evading tax in some of the areas in which
mining is an economic activity.
|
|
CSPR would like to remind
Government that the PRGF
agreement commits not only the
Government but its people to
certain undertakings with the
IMF. Consequently, the
government should RANK FIRST the
well being of the more than two
thirds of the population that
live in unacceptable poverty
conditions. CSPR acknowledges
that the PRGF defines the policy
framework and space for
implementation of the Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper, PRSP,
and is concerned that like the
previous PRGF, the one currently
under negotiation will precede
Zambia’s next PRSP whose
preparation the Government will
be spearheading during the
remainder of 2004.
There is no doubt that the
Government has to do more to
improve accountability and
budgetary management, but it is
unacceptable that the burden of
this adjustment should be borne
by the poor.
Civil society is demanding that
the IMF fulfils its promise as
laid out in its often repeated
claims to become more pro-poor.
It continues to preach fiscal
austerity but does not complain
about the misallocation of HIPC
resources which are supposed to
go to poverty reduction, and the
suspension of the independent
HIPC Monitoring Team, on which
civil society played a big role.
We call upon the IMF at all
levels to show that it is able
to set the right priorities in
economic policy advice. If it
does this, there will be no need
to maintain the secrecy
characterising its negotiations
with the government. As
Zambians, we are afraid that if
this trend of non- inclusion in
the negotiations continues, the
real costs of reaching the much
needed HIPC completion point
will outweigh the promised
benefits.
Besinati
Mpepo,
Former
Coordinator
Endorsed by:
Jesuit Centre for Theological
Reflection (JCTR)
Catholic Commission for Justice
Development and Peace (CCJDP)
Civil Servants Union of Zambia (CSUZ)
Community Based Natural Resource
Management and Sustainable
Agriculture (CONASA)
Forum for African Women
Educationalists in Zambia (FAWEZA) |
|
Download Entire Release
[PDF] |